02/04/2015 | CAA 2015 – KEEP THE REVOLUTION GOING
Outline
Outline
- What is a Scientific Community
- Similarities with FS Community
- Concepts of Reuse, Modulation and Reproducibility
- Reproducibility in Archaeology
- Conclusion
The scientific community
Diversity makes the difference
- Science is cumulative
- Importance of points of views
- Diversity invigorates problem solving
Functions of the scientific community
- Inspiration
- Motivation
- Scrutiny
Free Software and Science
Some similarities
- Peer review
- Validation and replication
- Culture of credit, civility
- Reputation
- Communication
Modifiability
- Centuries of accomodation to stable knowledge
- New paradigms with constant modulation
Chalenge the ‘Power of Knowledge’
C. Kelty, Two Bits
- New IT render the knowledge more dynamic (Vinck 2014)
- New practices: "Push and Publish" workflow (Kansa 2014)
- Finality of knowledge?
Reproducibility
Reuse and Reproducibility
"We often forget that scientific knowledge is reliable not because scientists are more clever, objective or honest than other people, but because their claims are exposed to criticism and replication." (Fanelli 2013)
Pedagogy
" In pedagogical terms, Windows is to fish as UNIX is to fishing lessons "
- Lions' Commentary on UNIX 6th Edition
Pedagogy
" In pedagogical terms, Windows is to fish as UNIX is to fishing lessons "
- Lions' Commentary on UNIX 6th Edition
- An R Companion to Quantifying Archaeology by Stephen Shennan from David L. Carlson
Pedagogy
" In pedagogical terms, Windows is to fish as UNIX is to fishing lessons "
- Lions' Commentary on UNIX 6th Edition
- An R Companion to Quantifying Archaeology by Stephen Shennan from David L. Carlson
- Quantitative Archaeology Wiki
Blurring the border
- (Archaeological) project with R on Hittite seals
Blurring the border
- (Archaeological) project with R on Hittite seals
- Turn into statistic question
Blurring the border: ‘Ambiguate’
- (Archaeological) project with R on Hittite seals
- Turn into statistic question
- Mixing of competences
Conclusion
Key points
- effect of FS in Science
- new perspective
- need for further advocacy for FS
- Open question: how far FS challenge knowledge transmission?
Colophon
Presentation written in Markdown (ioslides)
Compiled into HTML5 using RStudio
Source code hosting: https://github.com/nehemie/Slideshow
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2898-6217
Licensing:
Presentation: CC BY 4.0
Source code: MIT
Backup slide
Publishing and Pushing
References
Fanelli, Daniele. 2013. “Redefine Misconduct as Distorted Reporting.” Nature 494: 149. doi:10.1038/494149a.
Kansa, Eric C., Sarah Whitcher Kansa, and Benjamin Arbuckle. 2014. “Publishing and Pushing: Mixing Models for Communicating Research Data in Archaeology.” International Journal of Digital Curation 9.1: 57–70. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.301.
Kelty, Christopher M. 2001. “Free Software/Free Science.” First Monday 6 (12). http://pear.accc.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/902.
———. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Experimental Futures. Durham: Duke University Press. http://twobits.net/pub/Kelty-TwoBits.pdf.
Vinck, Dominique, and Claire Clivaz. 2014. “Les Humanités Délivrées. Savoir Et Culture Réinventés Hors Du Livre.” Revue d’anthropologie Des Connaissances 8.4: 681–704. doi:10.3917/rac.025.0681.